Sunday, 20 May 2018

Not everything that is learned is contained in books or Not all knowledge is found in Books SAMPLE ESSAYS

Not everything that is learned is contained in books or Not all knowledge is found in Books SAMPLE ESSAYS

Many people have said that not everything that is learned is contained in books, while many people also say that we get most of our knowledge from books. In my point of view, the latter one is as important as, if not more important than the former one, although not everything is contained in books, we have to learn most of the things in books. Among countless reasons, which influence the former one, I explore the most conspicuous aspects as follows:

The main reason I agree with the argument is that knowledge contained in books is systematic. As we know, almost all the books are the children of the marriage of the author’s thought with the real world. In order to express themselves, they surely use a very systematic structure to form a book, which have a specific note of their thought and experiences. With the systematic structure, we can learn things gradually, by our own pace and we need not to worry that if we had miss some of the important details because systematic structure never drop the essential points. What we only need to do is follow the instructions directed by the author and grasp the content by ourselves’ consideration.

There is another reason that deserves some words here, however, is that learning by reading books is an efficient way of accumulating knowledge. In ancient world, no books existed, and people should realize the world by exploring everything by themselves. This method apparently takes too much time and energy. But with the ready-made knowledge provided by the books put in front of us, why not take on it directly? It will save us a lot of time to take advantages of others’ thought and experiences than we explore them by ourselves.

It would not be too kindly disposed to the idea that not learning knowledge in books is not important. Of course, gaining knowledge from experience is not without advantages. Because experiencing the life by oneself would be more impressive and could affect you for a lifetime. Such examples are not rate in our personal life.

In a word, to choose way of gaining knowledge is something of a dilemma to public because they sometimes are confused by the seemingly good qualities of learning by experiences, but neglect the most genuinely good aspect of learning by reading. For the reasons presented above, I strongly commit to the notion to by reading, not by experiences.

It has been said, “Not everything that is learned from books.”  This is true, since we cannot know everything from a book or the other books. In my point of view, knowledge gained from books is more important than knowledge gained from experience for two main reasons as follows:

First of all, the reason of the importance is that the resource of knowledge from books is more wide and various than those of knowledge from experience. It can make us fit the necessary of the variety of life and work. That knowledge can be acquired from books written by our other persons who may be mostly our predecessors. In the fact, it is impossible for us to obtain all knowledge through our practices. When we are still students of school, we must study and read our textbooks or other books to get knowledge in our major or relative fields although we have to do some experiences in the lab sometimes.

The Second reason for the importance in gaining knowledge from books is that we can obtain it more quickly and more accurately than from our experience. We can spend very short time and less energy to obtain many knowledge which is from books written by other people who maybe had probably spend much time even their lifetime to make experiences and write books. As a student, one of us can study and know much knowledge which is concerned with many fields in one semester or one year.

Finally, the importance for obtaining knowledge from books lies on the obvious fact that it can save much money for us If we get all knowledge only from our practices, how much money must be taken cannot be known. For example, in order to get knowledge about one place though our practice, we have to spent money to go there by bus or other ways and spent money to live and stay there if it is necessary. On the other hand, we can only spend less money to obtain knowledge about there by buying and reading one book about there. Of course, knowledge gained from experience is also important for the reliability of knowledge must be tested and verified by experience. All of knowledge, which we study from books, is actually from other persons’ experience indirectly or directly. We have no reason to refuse accumulating knowledge though our experience and writing down as books and articles for our offspring or other persons to study and obtain them later.

But it is no doubt that we have infinitely chance and time to get all knowledge from our own practice. What we can do is get our necessary knowledge from books in our limited money and time and energy. Reading books is the more important way to obtain knowledge than making experience.

Upon the question that which source is more important? Knowledge gained from experience or from books? People may have different opinions. Admittedly, both of them have advantages and disadvantages, and they are both important. The undeniable fact is that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." If someone who wants to know how to swim or drive just reads through books but never experiences himself, he can learn nothing in the end. This example can tell us how important it is to gain knowledge from experience. But as for me, a college student, I would say, gaining knowledge from books are more important. There are three reasons support my point of view.

The main reason for my propensity for gaining knowledge from books is that, some knowledge can never be learned from experience. As we all know, some knowledge is recorded by scientists or people from ancient times to present, from home and abroad. They are the symbol of wisdom. We can say, books are not only excellent source for us to know about the past, but also excellent source for us to know what is happening in the world today, and what is probably going on in the future. Without books, how can we gain the precious knowledge from our forefathers? Without books, how can we know one thing or two about the outer space? Obviously, it is impossible to know that from experience.

A more personal reason why I think knowledge from books is a more important source is that it is not only a broader source, but also, it is an efficient way to learn. Gaining knowledge from books can save us a lot of time and energy. As a college student, it is not necessary to test every theory in one's own experience; and it is not necessary to get involved in explaining every phenomenon you meet by your own experience. Just look into your books! The knowledge from books can help you understand them more quickly and even better!

The last but not the least reason, knowledge gained from experience is relatively limited when compared with knowledge gained from books. Our life is limited. Time waits for no man. So, if we want to learn more, reading books is a better way! Through reading books, we will better develop our personality and our moral integrity, above all, enrich our own knowledge!

As I stated above, if you want to explore the mysteries in the treasure house of knowledge, pick up your books, and you will find the way!

We gain our knowledge about the world and our life from two sources: from experience and from books. These two resources are both important, but which of them is more important?

Knowledge from books forms a very important part of our knowledge structure. In schools and colleges, we learn knowledge which is fundamental to our future career. We learn knowledge from books in order to make our contributions to this society in the future. A student learns mathematics equations and other scientific knowledge and become a scientist or engineer. We will be illiterate and ignorant without learning knowledge from books. Moreover, we acquire knowledge about life and the world by reading books, magazines and newspapers. This is also very important as we cannot experience everything all by ourselves. Therefore books are a very important source of knowledge.

On the other hand, we can't learn everything from a book. “Experience is the best teacher” is an old cliche, but I agree with it. The most important, and sometimes the hardest, lessons we learn in life come from our participation in situations. We learn how to get along with others or how to have self-respect from our experience, not from books. We cannot learn emotional feelings, such as love and care, through books; they come from our real life experience. Knowledge from experience is also a very important supplement to knowledge from books.

Needless to say both learning sources, books and experience, are very important to us. But in my opinion knowledge from experience is more important, because without knowledge from experience, it is impossible to get a real understanding of knowledge from books, and how to apply this knowledge to real world situations.



Etiam at libero iaculis, mollis justo non, blandit augue. Vestibulum sit amet sodales est, a lacinia ex. Suspendisse vel enim sagittis, volutpat sem eget, condimentum sem.